PDA say zero tolerance needed to stop verbal abuse, intimidation, threats, racism, sexism and physical attacks.

A survey of pharmacists, previously reported by ITV News, has now concluded and reveals the reasons why the PDA believe the whole sector should adopt a zero tolerance approach to abuse of pharmacists.

Tue 14th April 2020 The PDA

The PDA has called again on all pharmacy employers to immediately adopt a “zero tolerance” approach towards abuse of pharmacists supported with clear statements to patients and 100% enforcement measures that make the safety of pharmacists and their teams a clear and consistent priority.

The long running PDA campaign to end abuse and violence in pharmacies has recently gained significant prominence as incidents of abuse and violence experienced in pharmacies has increased during the COVID crisis. The campaign has now brought the issue to the attention of politicians, police forces and the general public.  ITV evening news and News at Ten on 9 April reported preliminary results of a PDA survey exposing the reality of abuse of pharmacists and their teams and the PDA are now sharing the final results after the survey finished on Easter Monday.

PDA Director, Paul Day said “We know this isn’t all patients, nor the experience of a pharmacists every single day, but one incident of abuse or one assault is one too many and suggesting such behaviour can ever be excused creates an atmosphere that puts pharmacy teams at risk of further attacks. How can any pharmacy employer think that this could be acceptable? 

The survey had more than 1,200 responses in less than a week and revealed the following key results:

  • In the past month more than 90% of respondents have seen incidents where patients/customers have behaved abusively or aggressively towards them or their colleagues.
  • More than 80% noticed that the number of abusive or aggressive incidents has increased in the past month compared to normal levels.

The survey respondents reflected the scope of PDA membership with respondents from across the UK and across the sector. A majority of respondents from each sector of pharmacy had seen abuse, but those in community pharmacy had seen it significantly more frequently than others.

The examples provided by respondents to the survey make disturbing reading generating a 40 page report detailing verbal abuse, intimidation, threats, racism, sexism and physical attacks. While the PDA believe decent employers would, and do, naturally want zero tolerance of such treatment of their employees the following two quotes suggest that some pharmacists experience what might be described as the opposite of zero tolerance:

“Same man has made multiple pharmacy members cry. Was very aggressive and threatened me. Told xxxxx [the major pharmacy employer] about him and they did absolutely nothing. In fact, they offered him vouchers as he complained that we were rude. We literally have no support from anyone especially large multiples such as xxxxx who I work for who will do nothing about it.”

“I did have a particularly nasty incident whilst working for a large multiple xxxxx . A male customer came in with an incompletely written CD prescription for a relative. It was a Sunday. I told him I couldn’t accept the prescription as it was incomplete and needed to contact the prescriber. This opened up a torrent of abuse. No support staff were nearby and there was no security and I was pregnant at the time. It made me feel very vulnerable. He told me he’d make sure I lost my job and hoped that I got cancer amongst all the f… words. I reported it to xxxxx on the Monday and they said he’d been in touch and threatened to give xxxxx bad publicity. They told me they sent him vouchers !”

This is far from the first occasion that the PDA have heard from members that some pharmacy employers have apparently rewarded the aggressor after employees have complained about abuse.  So while we are disappointed to see similar reports in the responses to this survey, we are sadly not surprised.  Far from being worried about the bad publicity that could be generated by an aggressive customer, this employer should be embarrassed by the negative publicity that could be generated by these management actions, and the consequences that such poor management has for employees.

Mr Day concluded: “Any degree of abuse is unacceptable but it becomes even more worrying that we are aware of several very recent incidents that have involved physical attacks after which the police have been involved.  We made sure that the Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 carries greater penalties for attacking pharmacists, but our focus is on preventing attacks in the first place

Being able to abuse pharmacy staff without consequences creates no deterrent for potential aggressors.   This cannot be allowed to continue and employers need to play their part. Introducing a genuine zero tolerance approach would be welcomed by employees and locums who all have a right to go to work without fear of abuse or attack”

Last week the PDA called on the Company Chemists Association (CCA) to ask it’s members to adopt zero tolerance of abuse of pharmacists,   Read More.

Download the PDA poster here to display in your pharmacy:

thumbnail of Zero tolerance for abuse update

The Pharmacists' Defence Association is a company limited by guarantee. Registered in England; Company No 4746656.

The Pharmacists' Defence Association is an appointed representative in respect of insurance mediation activities only of
The Pharmacy Insurance Agency Limited which is registered in England and Wales under company number 2591975
and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (Register No 307063)

The PDA Union is recognised by the Certification Officer as an independent trade union.

Cookie Use

This website uses cookies to help us provide the best user experience. If you continue browsing you are giving your consent to our use of cookies.

General Guidance Resources Surveys PDA Campaigns Regulations Locums Indemnity Arrangements Pre-Regs & Students FAQs Coronavirus (COVID-19)