An employer's insurer looks after the interests of the employer, and these interests may well be different from those of the employee or locum.
The dangers
Many employee and locum pharmacists are told or are led to believe
by their employers that they do not need their own insurance because
they are covered by their employer's insurer. The National Pharmacy
Association (NPA) is the largest insurer of pharmacy employers in
the UK and it, too, promotes the view that its insurance scheme
extends to employees and locums. This is an over- simplification,
because an employer's defence association will control the defence
in the event of an error situation and this could place employee
and locum pharmacists at a considerable disadvantage.
The issues
The NPA is a membership organisation for owners of pharmacies
and as such its constitution requires it to back its members'
interests ahead of those of the employees.
The rules of the NPA state:
"Where a conflict arises [between the employer and
employee/locum] the Association's 'allegiance' must lie primarily
with the member – the owner of the business."
The practical consequences
Because of this situation, there are many practical
consequences which could leave the individual employee or locum
vulnerable and exposed. For example, because the employer's defence
association was controlling the defence, the employee or locum would
find it difficult to exonerate him/herself if the cause of the error
was an environmental issue that was under the control of the employer
and not the employee, e.g. poor staffing levels, staff training
cuts or questionable residential home or drug acquisition policies.
Further complications
What happens if the employee or locum is facing a criminal prosecution,
or a professional disciplinary hearing?
And what if the employee feels aggrieved and intends
to take the employer to an Industrial Tribunal?
Best interests served?
Any pharmacists who truly believe that their interests will always
be best served in all situations by relying on NPA insurance could
well regret that they did so.
It is clear that the interests of the employer are different from
the interests of the employee or locum.
Employers should rely on their employer Defence Association, and
employees and locums should rely on their own independent Defence
Association. This removes conflicts and should ensure the best possible
defence for all parties concerned.