COVID-19 VACCINATIONS: If, in addition to indemnity for your main employment, you would like cover for delivering COVID-19 Vaccinations please apply for our standalone extension Apply Today

Home   »   Employment Tribunal Cases

Employment Tribunal Cases

The PDA is often asked for our views on the benefits of working for specific employers. To assist members in reaching their own conclusions, we have developed this online resource which contains pharmacy related employment tribunal cases that we have become aware of. These Employment Tribunal judgements are publicly available documents, and some relate to employees other than pharmacists.

The judgments are unbiased legal decisions on the actions of the employer in relation to the employee.

Members are reminded that the Employment Tribunal decisions are case-specific and not indicative of the widespread poor practice of an employer. Also, the absence of an employer from the list of cases does not mean that that employer is better than any other, it simply indicates that there has been no case successfully brought against them to date.

  • Boots Management Services Ltd: Discrimination and breach of contract

    Tue 2nd October 2018 The PDA

    1. BY CONSENT, having now heard the evidence today, the Respondent now admits that the Claimant was at the material time an employee for the purposes of her unfair dismissal claim pursuant to the provisions of the Employment Rights Act 1996. 2. The application to amend the discrimination based claim so as to include additionally a claim of direct discrimination by way of associated disability and within the provisions of section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 is granted.  

  • Sharief Healthcare Limited: Harassment on grounds of disability

    Tue 18th January 2022 The PDA

    Claims of harassment on grounds of disability in respect to an incident on 7 January 2020 were well-founded and succeeded. 

  • Nevison Pharmacy LTD: Unauthorised deduction of wages

    Wed 19th February 2020 The PDA

    Claims of unauthorised deduction of wages succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a sum.  

  • Pharma-Z Ltd: Unfair dismissal

    Mon 2nd December 2019 The PDA

    Claims of unfair dismissal and discrimination were dismissed.  

  • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust: Harassment on grounds of race

    Mon 28th October 2019 The PDA

    Claims of harassment on grounds of race succeeded and the claimant was awarded a sum for injury to feelings.  

  • Barkerend Pharmacy Ltd: Breach of contract

    Wed 29th May 2019 The PDA

    Barkerend Pharmacy Ltd was found to have been in breach of contract and was therefore ordered to pay to the claimant paid expenses in the sum of £2,744.82.  

  • Reliance Locums Ltd: Constructive unfair dismissal

    Mon 20th May 2019 The PDA

    The claimant’s complaint is one of constructive unfair dismissal. It is the claimant’s case that the respondent was in fundamental breach of contract. The judge decided therefore that the Claimant should recover from the respondent a total of £2,748. 

  • Boots Management Services Ltd: Unfair dismissal

    Fri 17th May 2019 The PDA

    It was the unanimous decision of the Employment Tribunal that the claim of constructive unfair dismissal was upheld. The Respondent discriminated against the Claimant contrary to section 15 Equality Act 2010 (EQA) by issuing a PIP (performance improvement plan) on 30 September 2016. 

  • Pillbox Chemists Ltd: Unlawful deduction from an employees’ wages

    Fri 5th April 2019 The PDA

    Pillbox Chemists Ltd made an unlawful deduction from an employees' wages by failing to pay him wages from 1 March 2018 to 13 March 2018. This resulted in the Judge ordering Pillbox Chemists Lt to pay the employee the sum of £478.20 in respect of this unlawful deduction. 

  • Lloyds Pharmacy Ltd: Unfair dismissal

    Thu 28th February 2019 The PDA

    The claimant sent a claim form to the Tribunal complaining of unfair dismissal. In the response the respondent raised a preliminary issue that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claim as it was presented out of time in terms of section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (the ERA). The case was listed for a preliminary hearing to determine the issue of time bar. 

Next Page Next

Page 1 of 2

The Pharmacists' Defence Association is a company limited by guarantee. Registered in England; Company No 4746656.

The Pharmacists' Defence Association is an appointed representative in respect of insurance mediation activities only of
The Pharmacy Insurance Agency Limited which is registered in England and Wales under company number 2591975
and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (Register No 307063)

The PDA Union is recognised by the Certification Officer as an independent trade union.

Cookie Use

This website uses cookies to help us provide the best user experience. If you continue browsing you are giving your consent to our use of cookies.

General Guidance Resources Surveys PDA Campaigns Regulations Locums Indemnity Arrangements Pre-Regs & Students FAQs Coronavirus (COVID-19)